Opinion Sports Sports Columns

Losing a Lost Proposition

Marshall Hastings
Assistant Sports Editor

 

 

 

Itโ€™s a common belief, however wrong it may be, that a team must lose. No matter the sport, weโ€™re led to believe that losing is good. That losing is beneficial. That somehow, losing is needed.

Yes, losing helps teams realize what they do right, what they do wrong, and helps determine who and what does or doesnโ€™t work for the team.

But somewhere in the mix it seems weโ€™ve forgotten just how important winning is. See, as much as losses refocus you and point out your flaws, wins motivate you and show you just how dominant you can be.

Which is why the Kentucky Wildcats simply donโ€™t need to lose. In fact, they canโ€™t lose. They need to go undefeated.

In a world where the โ€˜greatestโ€™ always seem to be in the past, where no one current can out do what the previous did, Kentucky could buck this pointless trend.

No one will be better than MJ, no one will be as dominant as the โ€™85 Bears, no one can touch the Yankees of nearly any decade, so why canโ€™t Kentucky be that team?

Yes, Indiana went undefeated, running the table to a 32-0 season under Bobby Knight during the 1975-76 season, including an 86-68 beat down of Michigan in the National Championship game.

But in this new era of one and doneโ€™s, Kentucky has a chance to do something special. For starters, the margin from the nations best to the nations mediocre teams is thinning. The college ranks are loaded with future professional stars, future lottery picks, and future NBA superstars.

Next off, the season is longer. Kentucky already sits at 26-0, the best start in school history. With five games remaining in the regular season, the Wildcats would need just one win in the SEC Tournament to match the Knight-led Hoosiers and continue their pursuit of perfection.

The reason Kentucky canโ€™t lose is simple: John Calipari has a chance to prove that what heโ€™s doing isnโ€™t a flash in the pan. Calipari could take a bunch of young, potential pumping basketball players and put them at the pinnacle of college basketball.

He could do what he couldnโ€™t do a year ago, nor Steve Fischer and the 1991-92 Michigan Wolverines, affectionately nicknamed the โ€˜Fab Five.โ€™

He could take a bunch of young, unproven, future NBA stars and make them champions. Kids donโ€™t stick around long enough to create dynasties in college basketball. The one-and-doneโ€™s pick a college not for four years, but five months.

They choose the school with the most history, where if they come and go, they wonโ€™t be counted on to resurrect a program. They will only be counted on to continue a legacy of winning. Thatโ€™s why championship teams are often full of juniors and seniors, not freshman and sophomores pulling the weight.

Yes, you remember past champions. You will remember Kemba Walkerโ€™s unforgettable march to the National Championship, or Anthony Davisโ€™ dominant run in 2011.

There is also UCLAโ€™s dynasty under John Wooden, winning 10 championships in 12 years, or NC Stateโ€™s unforgettable upset over the Houston Cougars in 1983.

But unbeaten and unblemished is even better. Indiana and UCLA, the peak of perfection. Teams that run so well that no one could touch them. They were what every team strived to be. Every night, every team walks on the floor hoping to win. No one wants to lose, so why would you ever do it?

What fans truly remember are the teams that did the unthinkable. They outlasted, they beat down, and they destroyed every single team that stood in their way. Not 75 percent of their opponents, not 95 percent, not even 99 percent. Fans remember the teams that win every single time they step out there.

With the fanfare and attention this team is getting, a loss only takes that away. A loss points out their failures, it exposes their shortcomings and it creates doubt in the minds of players that simply donโ€™t think they will lose.

This team is too confident to lose. A loss tells them they arenโ€™t what they may think they are. Yes, they will undoubtedly enter the NCAA Tournament as the top seed or favorite, regardless if they enter it undefeated. But do you really want to see another 38-2 or 37-3 team win the National Championship? Weโ€™ve seen that before, weโ€™ll see it again.

But what we havenโ€™t seen in 39 years and may not see for another 39 is perfection. Wouldnโ€™t a change of pace be a little bit better?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Springfield Student

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading